Last Thursday, on the point that Sen. McCain would not bring change for America, Sen. Obama had this to say, “John McCain has voted with George Bush ninety percent of the time. Senator McCain likes to talk about judgment, but really, what does it say about your judgment when you think George Bush has been right more than ninety percent of the time? I don't know about you, but I'm not ready to take a ten percent chance on change.”
As I stated on my political blog, how can he say he’s not ready to take a “ten percent” chance on change with John McCain, but Americans are to take a one-hundred percent chance on him?
With the announcement of Alaskan Gov. Sarah Palin as Sen. McCain’s running mate, many have questioned as to whether or not she’s ready to lead the country. Now she’s not running for president, but there’s always the possibility that she could find herself in that position. So apparently we can’t risk electing McCain who will have a supposedly “inexperienced” VP who could possibly have to take the reins from McCain, but we can take a risk on Obama, a man WHO IS running for president.
On Meet the Press, Gov. Tim Pawlenty had this to say to about whether or not Palin is prepared to be VP, “Well, in fairness to Governor Palin, let's do the same analysis as to Senator Obama. He's basically graduated from law school, went on to be a community organizer and a law professor, went to the U.S. Senate and began running for president, essentially, the day he arrived. So he didn't even stick around in the Senate very long before he began running for governor (obviously meaning to say "president"). So what it is in his background, Tom, that would give him that same type of requisite wisdom and judgment and insight on national security matters or foreign affairs matter or anything else? But importantly, Senator--or Governor Palin is an executive. She has--during that time that he's been running for president, she's been running a large enterprise of the state of Alaska successfully as an executive, as commander in chief of the Alaska National Guard, and by all accounts, somebody who's formidable on policy, who's smart, and basically has guts and grit because of her background, and can relate to people.”
No matter who the country elects in November risks will be taken. In January of 2001, President Bush never expected 9/11. So a candidate, Democrat or Republican can say one thing but they aren’t fortune tellers. Barack Obama could indeed bring change for the better to America, or change for the worse. John McCain could turn out to prove anyone who says he was like Bush wrong- he could be the greatest president or the worst. A speech can spark interest, but it does not always prove that someone is ready to lead America, experience does. So look up Obama/Biden and McCain/Palin and see what your candidates have done to prove themselves.

